man
13/09/2001, 20:29
حسب هذا التقرير اود ان اعرف هل ممكن ان ترى
الرجاء المساعدة
This child was first seen in al nahdha Hospital on 25/7/2000 and reviewed on 25/9/2000 on 19/12/2000 . Multiple anomalies and abnormal eye were noted by the parents at birth . This is their first child and they are consanguineous .
On examination, both were Microphthalmic with micro cornea, sclerocornea, with multiple iris strands adherent to it . Iris hypoplasia and blue sclera . Digitally the intra ocular pressure was within normal limits . The ultrasonographic study also had confirmed the microphthalmic status with no retinal detachments .
The other anomalies that had been recorded were Microcephaly . Noisy strider , short neck , short neck , shield shaped chest pedal edema and wide space between 1st and 2nd ton in the left foot . G6 DD activity was normal and so with Hb electrophoresis . Torch titres were also negative .
The child was thus diagnosed to have peter syndrome . The extremely guarded visual prognosis had been explained . The details of glaucoma and Keratoplasty Vis a Vis child’s stays were also discyssed periodic follow up has been advised with the pediatrician and the Ophthalmologist .
الرجاء المساعدة
This child was first seen in al nahdha Hospital on 25/7/2000 and reviewed on 25/9/2000 on 19/12/2000 . Multiple anomalies and abnormal eye were noted by the parents at birth . This is their first child and they are consanguineous .
On examination, both were Microphthalmic with micro cornea, sclerocornea, with multiple iris strands adherent to it . Iris hypoplasia and blue sclera . Digitally the intra ocular pressure was within normal limits . The ultrasonographic study also had confirmed the microphthalmic status with no retinal detachments .
The other anomalies that had been recorded were Microcephaly . Noisy strider , short neck , short neck , shield shaped chest pedal edema and wide space between 1st and 2nd ton in the left foot . G6 DD activity was normal and so with Hb electrophoresis . Torch titres were also negative .
The child was thus diagnosed to have peter syndrome . The extremely guarded visual prognosis had been explained . The details of glaucoma and Keratoplasty Vis a Vis child’s stays were also discyssed periodic follow up has been advised with the pediatrician and the Ophthalmologist .